doorbell: is ugly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents noise
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, event
Weight: 0.43
, sound
Weight: 0.42
Siblings car alarm
Weight: 0.34
, alarm clock
Weight: 0.34
, alarm
Weight: 0.33
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.33
, loud noise
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ugly 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(doorbell, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(alarm clock, is ugly)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(doorbell, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(alarm clock, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(alarm clock, is ugly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(doorbell, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(doorbell, is ugly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(doorbell, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(doorbell, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(doorbell, is ugly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(doorbell, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(doorbell, is ugly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(doorbell, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(alarm clock, is ugly)