double: be less popular than singles

Related concepts

Parents	hit Weight: 0.60 , grand slam Weight: 0.58 , home run Weight: 0.54 , day Weight: 0.51
Siblings	takeout Weight: 0.36 , triple Weight: 0.36 , single Weight: 0.33 , homer Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be less popular than singles	1.00
is more popular	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(double, be less popular than singles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(single, is more popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(double, be less popular than singles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(single, is more popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(single, is more popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(double, be less popular than singles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(double, be less popular than singles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(double, be less popular than singles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(double, be less popular than singles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(double, be less popular than singles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(double, be less popular than singles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(double, be less popular than singles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(double, be less popular than singles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(single, is more popular)