doughnut: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.51
, snack
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, junk food
Weight: 0.48
, time
Weight: 0.46
Siblings dairy product
Weight: 0.28
, fast food
Weight: 0.27
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.27
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
has physical part hole 0.95
have holes in them 0.89
has physical part quick 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, has physical part quick)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(soy sauce, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, has physical part quick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(doughnut, has physical part holes)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has physical part hole)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(doughnut, has physical part hole)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(doughnut, has physical part hole)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(doughnut, has physical part hole)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has physical part quick)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(doughnut, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has physical part quick)