douglas fir: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.74
, conifer
Weight: 0.73
, tree
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, timber
Weight: 0.68
Siblings fir
Weight: 0.39
, oak tree
Weight: 0.39
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.38
, birch
Weight: 0.38
, maple tree
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(timber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(douglas fir, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(timber, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(timber, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fir, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(christmas tree, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(timber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(douglas fir, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fir, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(christmas tree, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(christmas tree, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(maple tree, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(maple tree, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(douglas fir, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(douglas fir, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(douglas fir, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(timber, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fir, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(christmas tree, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(maple tree, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(douglas fir, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(timber, is expensive)