dover: is sole expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.57
, community
Weight: 0.52
, port
Weight: 0.52
, area
Weight: 0.49
Siblings norfolk
Weight: 0.35
, newport
Weight: 0.34
, lexington
Weight: 0.34
, richmond
Weight: 0.34
, hastings
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sole expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lexington, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(richmond, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(newport, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(newport, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(newport, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(richmond, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(richmond, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lexington, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(lexington, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(dover, is sole expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dover, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dover, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dover, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(dover, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dover, is sole expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dover, is sole expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(richmond, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(newport, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dover, is sole expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lexington, is expensive)