draft: cool tower preferred in areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.65
, option
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, proposal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings typescript
Weight: 0.46
, amendment
Weight: 0.32
, declaration
Weight: 0.32
, blueprint
Weight: 0.32
, manuscript
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
cool tower preferred in areas 1.00
cool tower preferred 0.96
cool tower preferred in areas of humidity 0.93
cool tower preferred in areas of high humidity 0.93
cool tower 0.91
cool tower preferred in areas of relative humidity 0.91
cool tower preferred in areas of high relative humidity 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of relative humidity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of relative humidity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of relative humidity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(draft, cool tower)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of humidity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of humidity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(draft, cool tower)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(draft, cool tower)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of high relative humidity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of humidity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of high humidity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of high relative humidity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of relative humidity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(draft, cool tower)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of humidity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of high humidity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of high relative humidity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(draft, cool tower preferred)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of high relative humidity)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of high humidity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas of high humidity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(draft, cool tower preferred)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(draft, cool tower preferred in areas)