draft: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.65
, option
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, proposal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings typescript
Weight: 0.46
, amendment
Weight: 0.32
, declaration
Weight: 0.32
, blueprint
Weight: 0.32
, manuscript
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality better 0.89
has quality bad 0.87
has quality rights 0.79
is quality manual 0.75
has quality leverage 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(draft, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(option, has quality leverage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(draft, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(option, has quality leverage)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality leverage)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(typescript, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(typescript, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blueprint, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(declaration, has quality rights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(draft, is quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(option, has quality leverage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(draft, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amendment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blueprint, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(blueprint, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(typescript, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(typescript, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(typescript, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(typescript, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(declaration, has quality rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(declaration, has quality rights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(draft, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(draft, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(draft, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(draft, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(draft, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(draft, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(draft, is quality manual)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(draft, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(draft, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(draft, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(draft, is quality manual)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality manual)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(draft, is quality manual)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(draft, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(option, has quality leverage)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(declaration, has quality rights)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(blueprint, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(typescript, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(typescript, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(draft, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(option, has quality leverage)