dragon: has quality evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.71
, beast
Weight: 0.66
, monster
Weight: 0.65
, symbol
Weight: 0.64
Siblings komodo dragon
Weight: 0.43
, unicorn
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37
, fairy
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality evil 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(beast, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dragon, has quality evil)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(monster, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dragon, has quality evil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(monster, has quality evil)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(beast, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(beast, has quality evil)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(monster, has quality evil)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(beast, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dragon, has quality evil)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(monster, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dragon, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(dragon, has quality evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dragon, has quality evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dragon, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(monster, has quality evil)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beast, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(monster, has quality evil)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dragon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beast, has quality evil)