drawing: be in design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.67
, part
Weight: 0.59
, print
Weight: 0.58
, project
Weight: 0.58
, exercise
Weight: 0.57
Siblings reading
Weight: 0.32
, writing
Weight: 0.32
, public speaking
Weight: 0.31
, face
Weight: 0.31
, topic
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in design 1.00
be in graphic design 0.87
be in engineering 0.80
be used in engineering 0.79
be important to technical people like engineering 0.76
be important to people like engineering 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(drawing, be in design)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drawing, be used in engineering)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(drawing, be in graphic design)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(drawing, be in graphic design)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(drawing, be in engineering)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(drawing, be in engineering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(drawing, be used in engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(drawing, be in engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(drawing, be used in engineering)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drawing, be important to technical people like engineering)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(drawing, be important to people like engineering)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(drawing, be used in engineering)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drawing, be important to technical people like engineering)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(drawing, be important to people like engineering)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(drawing, be in graphic design)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(drawing, be important to technical people like engineering)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(drawing, be important to people like engineering)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(drawing, be in engineering)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(drawing, be in graphic design)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(drawing, be important to people like engineering)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(drawing, be important to technical people like engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(drawing, be in design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drawing, be in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(drawing, be in design)