dress: be in nyc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attire
Weight: 0.85
, garment
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.63
, outfit
Weight: 0.61
Siblings skirt
Weight: 0.60
, lace
Weight: 0.56
, sash
Weight: 0.45
, hem
Weight: 0.45
, shirt
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in nyc 1.00
be in new york october time 0.81
vancouver 0.76
turn up on acww ds 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(item, turn up on acww ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(dress, be in nyc)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(item, turn up on acww ds)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(item, turn up on acww ds)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sash, vancouver)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(item, turn up on acww ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dress, be in nyc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sash, vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sash, vancouver)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(dress, be in nyc)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dress, be in new york october time)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dress, be in new york october time)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(dress, be in new york october time)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dress, be in new york october time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dress, be in nyc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(dress, be in nyc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(item, turn up on acww ds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sash, vancouver)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(dress, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(item, turn up on acww ds)