dressing room: have bad lighting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad lighting 1.00
have lighting 0.97
have harsh lighting 0.92
light bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dressing room, have bad lighting)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dressing room, have lighting)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(dressing room, have lighting)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(dressing room, have lighting)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(dressing room, have harsh lighting)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(dressing room, have harsh lighting)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dressing room, have harsh lighting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(dressing room, light bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(dressing room, light bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dressing room, light bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dressing room, light bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dressing room, have harsh lighting)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dressing room, have lighting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dressing room, have bad lighting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(dressing room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dressing room, have bad lighting)