drink: be expensive in restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, beer
Weight: 0.67
, meal
Weight: 0.65
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings drinking water
Weight: 0.77
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.75
, apple juice
Weight: 0.74
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.73
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in restaurants 1.00
be expensive in pubs 0.80
is expensive 0.78
be at clubs expensive 0.77
be more popular than wine 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beer, be more popular than wine)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(drink, be expensive in restaurants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beer, be more popular than wine)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(beer, be more popular than wine)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(beer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beer, be more popular than wine)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(chocolate milk, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(drink, be expensive in restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(drink, be expensive in pubs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(drink, be expensive in pubs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(drink, be expensive in pubs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(drink, be expensive in pubs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(drink, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drink, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(drink, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(drink, be expensive in restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(beer, be more popular than wine)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(beer, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(beer, be more popular than wine)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(beer, is expensive)