drink: taste better with straw

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, beer
Weight: 0.67
, meal
Weight: 0.65
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings drinking water
Weight: 0.77
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.75
, apple juice
Weight: 0.74
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.73
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better with straw 1.00
taste good 0.83
taste better cold 0.83
taste better in cup 0.83
taste bad 0.82
taste better in glass 0.82
taste better in in bottle 0.81
taste better out of can 0.81
taste better with ice 0.81
taste better out of bottle 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beverage, taste better cold)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(beer, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drink, taste better with straw)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beer, taste bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(beverage, taste better cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beverage, taste better cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beverage, taste better cold)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(beer, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(drink, taste better with straw)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(drink, taste better with ice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drink, taste bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(drink, taste better with ice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, taste better out of can)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(drink, taste better out of bottle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, taste better cold)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, taste better in cup)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, taste better in glass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better with ice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better with ice)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better out of can)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(drink, taste bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better out of bottle)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(drink, taste better out of can)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better in cup)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better cold)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better in glass)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better out of can)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(drink, taste better out of bottle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(drink, taste bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(drink, taste better in glass)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(drink, taste better in cup)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(drink, taste better cold)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better out of bottle)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better in glass)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better in cup)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better cold)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drink, taste better with straw)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beer, taste bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beverage, taste better cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beer, taste bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(drink, taste better with straw)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beverage, taste better cold)