drive: be limited by size

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be limited by size 1.00
is smaller 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be limited by size)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is smaller)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hard drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be limited by size)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hard drive, is smaller) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is smaller)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(drive, be limited by size)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(drive, is smaller)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drive, is smaller)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drive, is smaller)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(drive, is smaller)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(drive, be limited by size)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(drive, be limited by size)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hard drive, be limited by size)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(drive, be limited by size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hard drive, is smaller)