drive: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(drive, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, get hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drive, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(hard drive, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hard drive, get hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drive, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(drive, get hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(drive, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drive, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(drive, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drive, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drive, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(drive, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(hard drive, get hot)