drive: have braille pads

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have braille pads 1.00
have braille 0.91
have braille on buttons 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(drive, have braille pads)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(drive, have braille)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(drive, have braille on buttons)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(drive, have braille on buttons)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(drive, have braille on buttons)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(drive, have braille on buttons)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(drive, have braille)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(drive, have braille)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drive, have braille)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(drive, have braille pads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(drive, have braille pads)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(drive, have braille pads)