drive: is read

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is read 1.00
be read on mac 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is read)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be read on mac)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(hard drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is read)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hard drive, be read on mac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be read on mac)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(drive, is read)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(drive, be read on mac)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(drive, be read on mac)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(drive, be read on mac)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(drive, be read on mac)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(drive, is read)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(drive, is read)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hard drive, is read)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(drive, is read) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hard drive, be read on mac)