driver: drive at night

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents passenger
Weight: 0.65
, soldier
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, young man
Weight: 0.63
Siblings bus driver
Weight: 0.82
, camera
Weight: 0.61
, fast car
Weight: 0.60
, hamilton
Weight: 0.60
, track
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
drive at night 1.00
drive on inside 0.87
drive on left 0.86
drive on inside of car 0.85
be allowed drive 0.81
drive with leg 0.81
drive with right leg 0.79
drive in left lane 0.78
drive on tracks 0.78
drive in lane 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(driver, drive at night)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(driver, drive on left)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(driver, drive on left)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(driver, drive on left)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(driver, be allowed drive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(driver, be allowed drive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(driver, be allowed drive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(driver, drive in left lane)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(driver, drive on left)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(driver, drive in left lane)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(driver, drive in left lane)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(driver, drive in left lane)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(driver, be allowed drive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(driver, drive at night)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(driver, drive at night)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driver, drive at night)