driving: be to air pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.60
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
Siblings drunk driving
Weight: 0.37
, car accident
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.33
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.33
, crash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to air pollution 1.00
cause pollution 0.92
pollute water air 0.89
contribute to smog 0.83
add to amount of carbon dioxide in air 0.81
pollute environment 0.81
pollute land 0.80
affect atmospheric ozone 0.79
affect ozone 0.78
impacts air quality 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(activity, contribute to smog)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(driving, be to air pollution)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(driving, be to air pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(activity, contribute to smog)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(activity, contribute to smog)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(motor vehicle, cause pollution)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(activity, contribute to smog)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(driving, be to air pollution)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(driving, be to air pollution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(motor vehicle, cause pollution)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(motor vehicle, cause pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(driving, be to air pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(driving, pollute environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(driving, pollute environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(driving, pollute environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(driving, pollute environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(driving, be to air pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(driving, be to air pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(activity, contribute to smog)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(motor vehicle, cause pollution)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(driving, be to air pollution)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(activity, contribute to smog)