drone: fly in national parks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents machine
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, enemy
Weight: 0.60
, robot
Weight: 0.59
, aircraft
Weight: 0.59
Siblings helicopter
Weight: 0.34
, ballistic missile
Weight: 0.34
, aircraft carrier
Weight: 0.33
, plane
Weight: 0.33
, fax machine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
fly in national parks 1.00
fly in parks 0.96
be allowed in national parks 0.92
be banned in national parks 0.89
be allowed in parks 0.87
be banned in parks 0.85
be fly coloured 0.77
fly 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(thing, fly)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(drone, fly in national parks)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(aircraft, fly)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(drone, fly in national parks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(aircraft, fly)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(thing, fly)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(aircraft, fly)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thing, fly)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, fly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plane, fly)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(thing, fly)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(aircraft, fly)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(helicopter, fly)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(helicopter, fly)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(plane, fly)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(plane, fly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(drone, fly in national parks)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(drone, be allowed in national parks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(drone, be allowed in national parks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(drone, be allowed in national parks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(drone, be banned in national parks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(drone, fly)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(drone, fly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(drone, fly)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(drone, be allowed in national parks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(drone, fly)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(drone, be banned in national parks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(drone, be banned in national parks)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(drone, be banned in national parks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(drone, fly in national parks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(aircraft, fly)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(thing, fly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(plane, fly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(helicopter, fly)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(aircraft, fly)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(drone, fly in national parks)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(thing, fly)