:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drop, be supposed work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dip, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drop, be supposed work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cut, work)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(drop, be supposed work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(dip, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dip, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(drop, be supposed work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cut, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cut, work)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(drop, be supposed work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(drop, work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(drop, be supposed work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drop, work)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drop, be supposed work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(dip, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drop, be supposed work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cut, work)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child