drug use: be high in u s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.66
, risk
Weight: 0.66
, crime
Weight: 0.66
Siblings cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.69
, meth
Weight: 0.69
, methamphetamine
Weight: 0.67
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.66
, alcohol
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in u s 1.00
be low in japan 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(crime, be low in japan)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drug use, be high in u s)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(crime, be low in japan)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(crime, be low in japan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(crime, be low in japan)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(drug use, be high in u s)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(drug use, be high in u s)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drug use, be low in japan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(drug use, be low in japan)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(drug use, be low in japan)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(drug use, be low in japan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drug use, be high in u s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drug use, be high in u s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(crime, be low in japan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(drug use, be high in u s)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(crime, be low in japan)