drunk people: drive in 50

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.41
Siblings drunk
Weight: 0.35
, different people
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.33
, good person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
drive in 50 1.00
drive like 85 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(drunk people, drive in 50)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(drunk people, drive in 50)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(drunk people, drive in 50)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(drunk people, drive like 85)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(drunk people, drive in 50)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(drunk people, drive like 85)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drunk people, drive in 50)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, drive like 85)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(drunk people, drive in 50)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(drunk people, drive like 85)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(drunk people, drive in 50)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drunk people, drive in 50)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, drive in 50)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(drunk people, drive in 50)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drunk people, drive in 50)