dry ice: melt in freezer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings water vapor
Weight: 0.35
, cold water
Weight: 0.35
, salt water
Weight: 0.34
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.34
, ice cube
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
melt in freezer 1.00
disappear in freezer 0.93
evaporate in freezer 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ice cube, disappear in freezer)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ice cube, evaporate in freezer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ice cube, disappear in freezer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ice cube, disappear in freezer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ice cube, evaporate in freezer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ice cube, evaporate in freezer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(dry ice, melt in freezer)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, disappear in freezer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, evaporate in freezer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(dry ice, disappear in freezer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(dry ice, evaporate in freezer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(dry ice, disappear in freezer)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, melt in freezer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dry ice, melt in freezer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ice cube, disappear in freezer)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, melt in freezer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ice cube, evaporate in freezer)