dry: be bad firing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.51
, wine
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, track
Weight: 0.48
Siblings dry ice
Weight: 0.33
, hot water
Weight: 0.33
, wet
Weight: 0.32
, moisture
Weight: 0.32
, acid rain
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad firing 1.00
be dangerous firing 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dry, be bad firing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(dry, be bad firing)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(dry, be bad firing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dry, be dangerous firing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dry, be bad firing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(dry, be dangerous firing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(dry, be bad firing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dry, be dangerous firing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(dry, be bad firing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(dry, be dangerous firing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(dry, be bad firing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dry, be bad firing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(dry, be bad firing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dry, be bad firing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dry, be bad firing)