duck: be good to eat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, bird
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mallard
Weight: 0.60
, goose
Weight: 0.36
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, blue bird
Weight: 0.36
, pigeon
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good to eat 1.00
be very good to eat 0.95
be eat 0.93
be used to eat 0.93
be very tasty to eat 0.89
be used to eat from 0.89
be used to eat food with 0.88
be used to eat food 0.88
be used to eat food off of 0.86
be used to eat off 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dish, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(duck, be good to eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dish, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(duck, be good to eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dish, be used to eat food with)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(duck, be good to eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dish, be used to eat from)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(duck, be good to eat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dish, be used to eat food off of)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(duck, be good to eat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dish, be used to eat off)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(duck, be good to eat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(dish, be used to eat off)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(dish, be used to eat food off of)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(dish, be used to eat)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(dish, be used to eat from)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dish, be used to eat food with)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dish, be used to eat food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dish, be used to eat off)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(dish, be used to eat)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(dish, be used to eat from)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dish, be used to eat food off of)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dish, be used to eat food)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dish, be used to eat food with)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dish, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dish, be used to eat from)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dish, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dish, be used to eat food with)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dish, be used to eat food off of)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dish, be used to eat off)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(duck, be good to eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(duck, be good to eat)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(duck, be very good to eat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(duck, be eat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(duck, be eat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(duck, be very tasty to eat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(duck, be very good to eat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(duck, be used to eat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be used to eat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(duck, be very good to eat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(duck, be very good to eat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(duck, be used to eat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(duck, be very tasty to eat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(duck, be used to eat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(duck, be eat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(duck, be very tasty to eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(duck, be eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(duck, be very tasty to eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(duck, be good to eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat from)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat food with)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat food off of)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat off)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat from)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat food with)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat food off of)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(duck, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat off)