duck: be roast

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, bird
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mallard
Weight: 0.60
, goose
Weight: 0.36
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, blue bird
Weight: 0.36
, pigeon
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be roast 1.00
be used to turkey soup 0.79
be cook 0.76
be used to cook 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dish, be used to cook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(duck, be roast)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(dish, be used to cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dish, be used to cook)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dish, be used to cook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(duck, be roast)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(duck, be roast)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(duck, be cook)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(duck, be cook)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(duck, be cook)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(duck, be cook)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(duck, be roast)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(duck, be roast)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(dish, be used to cook)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(duck, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(dish, be used to cook)