duck: go under water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fowl
Weight: 0.66
, bird
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mallard
Weight: 0.60
, coot
Weight: 0.58
, snow goose
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
go under water 1.00
get out of water 0.84
is water 0.84
keep in water 0.83
run on water 0.83
need water 0.83
stay in water 0.82
stay in cold water 0.80
need water eat 0.80
put mud in water 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bird, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(duck, go under water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bird, need water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bird, need water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bird, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(duck, go under water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(duck, go under water)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(duck, run on water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, keep in water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(duck, get out of water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(duck, is water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(duck, need water)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(duck, go under water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(duck, go under water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bird, need water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(duck, go under water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bird, need water)