duck: survive in water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fowl
Weight: 0.66
, bird
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mallard
Weight: 0.60
, coot
Weight: 0.58
, snow goose
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in water 1.00
survive in cold water 0.94
survive in freezing water 0.90
survive in freezing cold water 0.87
keep in water 0.83
adapt to water 0.83
is water 0.83
stay in water 0.82
get out of water 0.82
need water 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bird, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(duck, survive in water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bird, need water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bird, need water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bird, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(duck, survive in water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(duck, survive in water)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(duck, is water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(duck, keep in water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(duck, is water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(duck, is water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(duck, need water)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(duck, survive in water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(duck, survive in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bird, need water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(duck, survive in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bird, need water)