duct tape: be called gaffer tape

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adhesive tape
Weight: 0.85
, material
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.63
, tape
Weight: 0.62
Siblings magnetic tape
Weight: 0.37
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36
, tape dispenser
Weight: 0.36
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, tape measure
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called gaffer tape 1.00
be called tape 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tape, be called tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(duct tape, be called gaffer tape)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tape, be called tape)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tape, be called tape)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tape, be called tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(duct tape, be called gaffer tape)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(duct tape, be called gaffer tape)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(duct tape, be called tape)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(duct tape, be called tape)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(duct tape, be called tape)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be called tape)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be called gaffer tape)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(duct tape, be called gaffer tape)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tape, be called tape)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(duct tape, be called gaffer tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tape, be called tape)