dutch: were successful in new netherland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.55
, europe
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.49
, player
Weight: 0.48
, place
Weight: 0.47
Siblings american english
Weight: 0.34
, italian language
Weight: 0.34
, english language
Weight: 0.34
, chinese language
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were successful in new netherland 1.00
were successful in netherland 0.97
were in new world similar 0.80
were in new world different 0.79
were in new world 0.79
were in world similar 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(dutch, were successful in new netherland)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dutch, were successful in netherland)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dutch, were successful in netherland)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dutch, were successful in netherland)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dutch, were in new world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dutch, were in new world similar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dutch, were in new world different)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dutch, were in new world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(dutch, were in new world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dutch, were in world similar)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(dutch, were in new world similar)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(dutch, were in new world similar)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(dutch, were in world similar)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(dutch, were in world similar)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dutch, were in new world different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(dutch, were in new world different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dutch, were successful in netherland)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dutch, were in new world similar)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(dutch, were in new world)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(dutch, were in world similar)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(dutch, were in new world different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(dutch, were successful in new netherland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dutch, were successful in new netherland)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dutch, were successful in new netherland)