duty: go along with rights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expectation
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.59
, order
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings code
Weight: 0.61
, preparation
Weight: 0.59
, promotion
Weight: 0.57
, privilege
Weight: 0.31
, burden
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
go along with rights 1.00
be as important as rights 0.86
enjoy more rights than human beings 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(duty, go along with rights)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(duty, go along with rights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(duty, go along with rights)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(duty, be as important as rights)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(duty, be as important as rights)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(duty, be as important as rights)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(duty, be as important as rights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(duty, go along with rights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(duty, go along with rights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(duty, go along with rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings)