dvd: be better than cd

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disk
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.63
, merchandise
Weight: 0.62
, dvd player
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cd player
Weight: 0.36
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.36
, xbox
Weight: 0.35
, ipod
Weight: 0.35
, cd rom
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than cd 1.00
be instead of cd 0.94
be than cds 0.83
be better than mp3s 0.81
be better than ps3 0.80
hold more memory than cds 0.80
be live better than psn 0.80
read cds 0.80
be better than ps 0.79
be better than pepsi 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cd player, read cds)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ipod, be better than mp3s)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(xbox, be better than ps)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(xbox, be better than ps3)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cd player, read cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cd player, read cds)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(xbox, be better than ps3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(xbox, be better than ps3)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ipod, be better than mp3s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ipod, be better than mp3s)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(xbox, be better than ps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(xbox, be better than ps)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(dvd, be better than cd)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(dvd, be instead of cd)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(dvd, be instead of cd)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(dvd, be instead of cd)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(dvd, be than cds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(dvd, be than cds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(dvd, be than cds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(dvd, hold more memory than cds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dvd, hold more memory than cds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(dvd, hold more memory than cds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(dvd, hold more memory than cds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be instead of cd)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be than cds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dvd, be better than cd)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cd player, read cds)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(xbox, be better than ps3)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(xbox, be better than ps)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be better than cd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ipod, be better than mp3s)