dvd: look bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disk
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.63
, merchandise
Weight: 0.62
, dvd player
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cd player
Weight: 0.36
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.36
, xbox
Weight: 0.35
, ipod
Weight: 0.35
, cd rom
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
look bad 1.00
go bad 0.88
is live bad 0.79
look bad on hdtv 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
be bad at school 0.77
have bad players 0.76
look on computer 0.75
sucking bad right now 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(disk, go bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dvd, look bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(disk, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(disk, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(floppy disk, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ipod, be bad at school)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ipod, have bad players)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(disk, go bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(dvd, look bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(floppy disk, go bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(floppy disk, go bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(ipod, have bad players)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ipod, have bad players)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ipod, be bad at school)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ipod, be bad at school)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(dvd, look bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(dvd, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dvd, go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(dvd, look on computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dvd, look on computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(dvd, go bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dvd, look bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dvd, look bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(disk, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(floppy disk, go bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ipod, have bad players)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ipod, be bad at school)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dvd, look bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(disk, go bad)