dwarf: have similar facial features

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, race
Weight: 0.59
, term
Weight: 0.51
, variety
Weight: 0.49
, activity
Weight: 0.48
Siblings midget
Weight: 0.36
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.32
, giant sequoia
Weight: 0.32
, great ape
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have similar facial features 1.00
have facial features 0.98
have similar features 0.88
has physical part features 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(dwarf, have similar facial features)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dwarf, have facial features)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dwarf, have facial features)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dwarf, have facial features)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dwarf, have similar features)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(dwarf, have similar features)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dwarf, have similar features)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(dwarf, has physical part features)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(dwarf, has physical part features)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dwarf, has physical part features)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dwarf, have facial features)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dwarf, have similar features)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dwarf, has physical part features)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dwarf, have similar facial features)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dwarf, have similar facial features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dwarf, have similar facial features)