ear: pop on planes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.65
, device
Weight: 0.61
, organ
Weight: 0.60
, tissue
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings inner ear
Weight: 0.66
, nose
Weight: 0.35
, arm
Weight: 0.34
, mouth
Weight: 0.34
, neck
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
pop on planes 1.00
pop in airplanes 0.96
pop on plane 0.93
pop 0.82
pop on mountains 0.78
hurt on flights 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(neck, pop)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(neck, pop)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(neck, pop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ear, pop on planes)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ear, pop on plane)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ear, pop on plane)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ear, pop on plane)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ear, pop on mountains)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(ear, pop on mountains)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(ear, pop)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ear, pop on plane)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ear, pop)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ear, pop)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ear, pop on mountains)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ear, pop on mountains)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ear, pop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ear, pop on planes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ear, pop on planes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ear, pop on planes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(neck, pop)