eat in restaurant: be motivated by food be good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be motivated by food be good 1.00
be motivated by food 0.95
be motivated by some food 0.93
be motivated by food without have to cook it 0.87
requires food 0.84
causes eat food you have before 0.84
causes eat food that you do not prepare 0.83
be used to enjoy food 0.82
causes get wrong food 0.82
requires pay for your food 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by some food)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by some food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by some food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food without have to cook it)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food without have to cook it)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food without have to cook it)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, causes eat food you have before)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, causes eat food you have before)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, requires food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, causes eat food that you do not prepare)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, causes eat food that you do not prepare)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, causes get wrong food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, requires pay for your food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires pay for your food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, causes eat food you have before)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, causes eat food that you do not prepare)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, causes get wrong food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food without have to cook it)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires pay for your food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, causes eat food that you do not prepare)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by some food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, causes get wrong food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, causes eat food you have before)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, requires food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, requires pay for your food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, causes get wrong food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by food be good)