eat in restaurant: be used to sample new cuisine

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to sample new cuisine 1.00
requires order from restaurant menu 0.77
requires read menu 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, requires order from restaurant menu)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, requires read menu)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires read menu)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, requires read menu)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, requires order from restaurant menu)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires order from restaurant menu)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires read menu)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires order from restaurant menu)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, be used to sample new cuisine)