eat place: be at hotel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hotel 1.00
be at restaurant 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(eat place, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(eat place, be at hotel)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(eat place, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(eat place, be at restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(eat place, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(eat place, be at restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(eat place, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(eat place, be at restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(eat place, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(eat place, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(eat place, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(eat place, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(eat place, be at hotel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(eat place, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(eat place, be at hotel)