eat: be used to experience delicious taste

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.53
, food
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.50
, day
Weight: 0.50
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.34
, junk food
Weight: 0.34
, fast food
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.33
, fresh food
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to experience delicious taste 1.00
be used to enjoy taste 0.91
has taste 0.89
be motivated by it taste good 0.87
taste salty 0.86
taste good with salt 0.84
be yummy 0.81
be spicy 0.79
be eat from dish 0.78
serve greasy over-priced meal 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(food, has taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(eat, be used to experience delicious taste)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(food, be yummy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(eat, be used to experience delicious taste)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(food, be yummy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(food, has taste)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(food, be yummy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(food, has taste)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, serve greasy over-priced meal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(food, has taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(eat, be used to experience delicious taste)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(food, be yummy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(eat, be used to experience delicious taste)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, serve greasy over-priced meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, serve greasy over-priced meal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(eat, be used to experience delicious taste)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(eat, be used to enjoy taste)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(eat, be used to enjoy taste)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(eat, be used to enjoy taste)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(eat, be used to enjoy taste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eat, be used to experience delicious taste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(eat, be used to experience delicious taste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(food, has taste)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food, be yummy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, serve greasy over-priced meal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(food, has taste)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(eat, be used to experience delicious taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food, be yummy)