eating disorder: be more common than other dance styles

Related concepts

Parents	mental disorder Weight: 0.86 , personality disorder Weight: 0.83 , mental health problem Weight: 0.74 , mental illness Weight: 0.72
Siblings	bulimia Weight: 0.74 , overeating Weight: 0.72 , obesity Weight: 0.67 , depression Weight: 0.65 , purging Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more common than other dance styles	1.00
be more common in cultures	0.84
be more common in western cultures	0.82
is more common now than in 1950s	0.80
is more common	0.80
be more common in females	0.79
is more common now	0.79
be more common in countries	0.78
become more common	0.78
be common in ages 15-24	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(mental illness, become more common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(personality disorder, be more common in females) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(personality disorder, be more common in females)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(mental illness, become more common)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(personality disorder, be more common in females)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(mental illness, become more common)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(depression, be more common in females)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(depression, is more common now)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(bulimia, be more common in females)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(depression, become more common)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(depression, be common in ages 15-24)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(personality disorder, be more common in females) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(mental illness, become more common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(depression, be more common in females) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(depression, be more common in females)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(bulimia, be more common in females) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(bulimia, be more common in females)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(depression, is more common now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(depression, is more common now)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(depression, become more common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(depression, become more common)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(depression, be common in ages 15-24) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(depression, be common in ages 15-24)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more common in cultures)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more common in western cultures)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be more common in cultures)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be more common in western cultures)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.02

Salient(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(eating disorder, be more common in cultures)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.02

Salient(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(eating disorder, be more common in western cultures)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more common in females)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common in females)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be more common in females)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

Salient(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(eating disorder, be more common in females)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common in western cultures)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common in cultures)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.02

Salient(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(personality disorder, be more common in females)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(mental illness, become more common)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(depression, be more common in females)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(bulimia, be more common in females)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(depression, is more common now)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(depression, become more common)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(depression, be common in ages 15-24)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(mental illness, become more common)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(eating disorder, be more common than other dance styles) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(personality disorder, be more common in females)