eating: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habit
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, ritual
Weight: 0.58
, game
Weight: 0.58
Siblings eating apple
Weight: 0.36
, eating breakfast
Weight: 0.36
, fasting
Weight: 0.34
, exercising
Weight: 0.34
, bad food
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
be saturated dangerous brainly 0.80
be saturated dangerous 0.80
be saturated dangerous answers 0.76
be saturated fat dangerous 0.76
be saturated fat dangerous brainly 0.76
be considered unhealthy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fasting, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(fasting, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fasting, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(eating, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(eating, be saturated dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(eating, be saturated dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(eating, be saturated dangerous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(eating, be saturated fat dangerous brainly)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(eating, be saturated fat dangerous brainly)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(eating, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(eating, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(eating, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fasting, is dangerous)