echidna: be different from mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.53
, mammal
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.52
, monotreme
Weight: 0.51
, wildlife
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, crocodile
Weight: 0.34
, otter
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from mammals 1.00
be different from other mammals 0.99
is mammals 0.95
is marsupials 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(monotreme, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(monotreme, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(monotreme, is mammals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, is mammals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from other mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other mammals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, is mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(mammal, is mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(otter, is mammals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(monotreme, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(monotreme, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(otter, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(otter, is mammals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(echidna, be different from mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(echidna, is mammals)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from other mammals)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(echidna, is mammals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(echidna, is mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(echidna, is mammals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(echidna, is marsupials)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(echidna, be different from other mammals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(echidna, is marsupials)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(echidna, is marsupials)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(echidna, is marsupials)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(echidna, be different from other mammals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from other mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(monotreme, is mammals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammal, is mammals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(otter, is mammals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(monotreme, is mammals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammal, is mammals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other mammals)