echinoderm: be most advanced of invertebrates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, organism
Weight: 0.53
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.51
, species
Weight: 0.47
, fish
Weight: 0.47
Siblings starfish
Weight: 0.68
, sea cucumber
Weight: 0.64
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, cassowary
Weight: 0.35
, mollusk
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be most advanced of invertebrates 1.00
be considered most advanced invertebrates 0.99
be most advanced group of invertebrates 0.98
be considered advanced invertebrates 0.98
is most complex invertebrates 0.92
be considered invertebrates 0.91
is invertebrates 0.91
be different from invertebrates 0.90
is complex invertebrates 0.90
be different from other invertebrates 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, is invertebrates)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(starfish, is invertebrates)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(starfish, is invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(starfish, is invertebrates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mollusk, is invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(mollusk, is invertebrates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(echinoderm, is invertebrates)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, is invertebrates)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered invertebrates)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be most advanced group of invertebrates)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced group of invertebrates)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered most advanced invertebrates)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be different from invertebrates)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(echinoderm, is most complex invertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered invertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be different from other invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be different from invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be most advanced group of invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be different from invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced group of invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered most advanced invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be different from invertebrates)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, is most complex invertebrates)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, is most complex invertebrates)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be different from other invertebrates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(echinoderm, is invertebrates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(echinoderm, is most complex invertebrates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be different from other invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be different from other invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered most advanced invertebrates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered invertebrates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered most advanced invertebrates)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, is invertebrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(starfish, is invertebrates)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(mollusk, is invertebrates)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be most advanced of invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)