ecologist: study population rather entire species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.62
, expert
Weight: 0.61
, biologist
Weight: 0.54
, researcher
Weight: 0.51
, economist
Weight: 0.47
Siblings geneticist
Weight: 0.36
, geologist
Weight: 0.36
, zoologist
Weight: 0.35
, archaeologist
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
study population rather entire species 1.00
study population rather then entire species 0.99
study specific population rather entire species 0.98
study population entire species 0.98
study population then entire species 0.98
study specific population rather then entire species 0.97
study population of organisms rather entire species 0.97
study population of organisms rather then entire species 0.97
study population rather species 0.97
study population rather then species 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population rather then species)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population of organisms rather then entire species)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population rather then entire species)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population rather then entire species)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population rather then entire species)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population of organisms rather then entire species)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population rather then species)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population rather then entire species)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population rather then entire species)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population rather then species)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population then entire species)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population of organisms rather then entire species)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population rather entire species)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population entire species)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population rather species)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population of organisms rather entire species)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population rather then entire species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population rather species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population of organisms rather entire species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population then entire species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population then entire species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population rather species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population of organisms rather entire species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population rather entire species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population entire species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population rather entire species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population entire species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population entire species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population rather entire species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population then entire species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population of organisms rather entire species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather then entire species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population rather then entire species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population of organisms rather then entire species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather then species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather entire species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ecologist, study population rather entire species)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population rather entire species)