ecologist: study specific population then species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.62
, expert
Weight: 0.61
, biologist
Weight: 0.54
, researcher
Weight: 0.51
, economist
Weight: 0.47
Siblings geneticist
Weight: 0.36
, geologist
Weight: 0.36
, zoologist
Weight: 0.35
, archaeologist
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
study specific population then species 1.00
study specific population species 0.99
study specific population rather then species 0.98
study specific population rather species 0.98
study specific population then entire species 0.97
study specific population of organisms then species 0.97
study population then species 0.97
study specific population entire species 0.97
study specific population of organisms rather then species 0.96
study specific population of organisms species 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population rather then species)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population of organisms rather then species)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population species)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population entire species)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then entire species)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population rather then species)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population rather species)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population of organisms species)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population rather then species)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population of organisms then species)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population of organisms rather then species)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population then species)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population then species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population of organisms then species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population of organisms rather then species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population rather then species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population rather species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population then species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population then entire species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population of organisms rather then species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population entire species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population of organisms species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population then species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population of organisms then species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population of organisms then species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population rather species)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then entire species)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population rather species)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population species)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population of organisms species)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population entire species)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population then entire species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population species)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population of organisms species)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population entire species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)