economist: disagree on economic issues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.69
, expert
Weight: 0.63
, figure
Weight: 0.61
, scholar
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ecologist
Weight: 0.47
, geneticist
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
disagree on economic issues 1.00
disagree over economic theories 0.90
disagree on normative issues 0.88
disagree 0.87
have different views on economy 0.80
consider economic model useful 0.75
be important to economy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(expert, disagree)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(economist, disagree on economic issues)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(expert, disagree)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(expert, disagree)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(expert, disagree)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(economist, disagree on economic issues)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(economist, disagree on economic issues)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(economist, disagree over economic theories)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(economist, disagree)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(economist, disagree on normative issues)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(economist, disagree)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(economist, have different views on economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(economist, be important to economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(economist, disagree)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(economist, disagree on normative issues)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(economist, disagree over economic theories)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(economist, be important to economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(economist, disagree)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(economist, have different views on economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(economist, be important to economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(economist, have different views on economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(economist, be important to economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(economist, disagree on normative issues)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(economist, have different views on economy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(economist, disagree over economic theories)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(economist, disagree on normative issues)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(economist, disagree over economic theories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(economist, disagree on economic issues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(economist, disagree on economic issues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(expert, disagree)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(economist, disagree on economic issues)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(expert, disagree)