ecosystem: be with great variety important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents environment
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.73
, coral reef
Weight: 0.67
, estuary
Weight: 0.66
, fish
Weight: 0.65
, ocean
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with great variety important 1.00
support variety 0.84
be important for us 0.79
be different 0.79
is different 0.79
be important to us 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(thing, is different)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(thing, be different)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(environment, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(environment, be important for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(thing, be different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(thing, is different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(environment, be important for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(thing, be different)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(thing, is different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(thing, is different)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(thing, be different)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(environment, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(coral reef, be different)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be with great variety important)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ecosystem, support variety)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ecosystem, support variety)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be different)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, support variety)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, support variety)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, is different)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ecosystem, is different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important to us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important for us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important for us)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to us)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be different)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, is different)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important for us)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important for us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ecosystem, is different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(environment, be important for us)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(thing, is different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(thing, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(coral reef, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(environment, be important for us)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(thing, is different)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ecosystem, be with great variety important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(thing, be different)