ecosystem: is more efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents environment
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.73
, coral reef
Weight: 0.67
, estuary
Weight: 0.66
, fish
Weight: 0.65
, ocean
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more efficient 1.00
is more productive 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(estuary, is more productive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(estuary, is more productive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(estuary, is more productive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ecosystem, is more efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, is more productive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ecosystem, is more productive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, is more productive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ecosystem, is more productive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, is more efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ecosystem, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(estuary, is more productive)