edema: is beneficial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.66
, condition
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.53
, complication
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.49
Siblings pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.39
, pleural effusion
Weight: 0.36
, cystic fibrosis
Weight: 0.36
, inflammation
Weight: 0.35
, syncope
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is beneficial 1.00
is harmful 0.81
be important to gilgamesh 0.79
be important in servicescapes 0.78
is problematic 0.78
be harmful to us 0.77
is effective 0.76
is valuable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(edema, is beneficial)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(edema, is beneficial)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is beneficial)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, is valuable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, is effective)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, be harmful to us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is harmful)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(edema, is beneficial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(inflammation, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(inflammation, is beneficial)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inflammation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(inflammation, is harmful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inflammation, is problematic)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(inflammation, is problematic)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(inflammation, be harmful to us)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(inflammation, be harmful to us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pleural effusion, is effective)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, is effective)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(edema, is beneficial)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(edema, is valuable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(edema, is valuable)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(edema, is valuable)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(edema, is valuable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(edema, is beneficial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(inflammation, is harmful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(inflammation, is problematic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(inflammation, is beneficial)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, is effective)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(inflammation, be harmful to us)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(edema, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)